This past Tuesday, in a 5-4 vote along traditional liberal-conservative lines with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy as the swing, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling in McQuiggin v. Perkins, that in certain instances would allow imprisoned convicts to file habeas corpus motions challenging their convictions even after firm filing deadlines had passed.
The operative federal law is the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, passed during the Clinton administration. We joined the campaign for the passage of that act. Here’s why we think the high court acted properly in contravening part of it.